The evolving threat of transaction laundering in 2024

How much do we really know about the new methods criminal merchants use to legitimise their illicit wealth right under our noses?

Transaction laundering is a prime example of this. It’s a sophisticated form of electronic money laundering where illegal merchants use legitimate payment channels to process transactions. Essentially, they hide their illicit activities by funnelling payments through approved vendors or merchant accounts. 

While money laundering concerns itself with obscuring the source of funds, transaction laundering is about obscuring the source of a payments transaction. Bad actors deliberately misrepresent themselves as legitimate merchants in order to process credit card payments without detection.

In transaction laundering, a seemingly legitimate merchant handles payments for a hidden or illegal business, effectively cleaning the dirty money. This method takes advantage of the credibility of established payment systems, masking unlawful transactions as ordinary business activities.

Criminals use various techniques to execute transaction laundering, often employing sophisticated methods to obscure the true nature of the funds. One common approach is to use shell companies or fake businesses to process transactions, making the illicit money look like it comes from legitimate sales. This technique is employed to evade detection by financial institutions and regulatory bodies.

Traditional techniques

Traditional methods of transaction laundering involve several key techniques:

• Use of Shell Companies: Criminals establish fake companies that appear legitimate on paper. These shell companies process transactions that are, in reality, laundering illegal funds. For instance, funds from illicit activities are deposited into these companies' accounts and then transferred to other accounts, creating a complex web of transactions that obscures the original source of the money.
• Fake Invoices and Payments: By generating false invoices and payments, criminals can make it appear as though transactions are legitimate business dealings. These fake invoices are used to justify the movement of funds between different accounts, helping to disguise the true nature of the money.
• Overstated Transactions: Criminals may use exaggerated or inflated transactions to launder money. For example, a company might report significantly higher sales figures than actual, using the excess to process illicit funds and make them look like legitimate revenue.

Emerging techniques and technologies

The landscape of transaction laundering is evolving with advances in technology. Recent developments include:

• Synthetic Identities: Criminals create synthetic identities by combining real and fake information to open fraudulent accounts. These identities are used to process transactions, making it difficult to trace the illicit funds. For instance, in Miami in August 2020, two individuals used synthetic identities to defraud banks and steal over $3 million from Covid-19 relief programmes.
• AI-Driven Methods: Artificial intelligence and machine learning are increasingly used by criminals to simulate legitimate transactions across multiple accounts. This technology allows them to mask the movement of illicit funds and adjust tactics in real-time to evade detection.

Proof of advanced techniques

In Miami, August 2020, two individuals were charged for using synthetic identities to defraud banks and steal over $3 million from Covid-19 relief programmes. They created fake identities and shell companies to open bank accounts and process fraudulent transactions. This case demonstrates how AI-driven techniques can facilitate large-scale financial crimes.

The implications are far-reaching. The ability to generate synthetic identities could easily extend to transaction laundering, where fake personas might be used to make individual or small-group purchases of goods or services. These transactions could then be routed through multiple accounts and shell companies, making it difficult to trace the illicit funds.

Furthermore, deepfake technology, as seen in Hong Kong in early 2024, could be employed to manipulate stakeholders into approving large financial transfers or transactions. In this case, a finance worker was duped into transferring $25 million after interacting with deepfake recreations of company staff. The use of AI-generated identities and digital forgeries highlights how advanced technologies are increasingly being exploited to obscure financial crimes and evade traditional detection methods.

Hypothetical case: The "Virtual Merchants" Scheme

In a hypothetical scenario, imagine a criminal organisation using advanced technology to create fake online storefronts for seemingly legitimate e-commerce businesses. They set up multiple "virtual merchants" that sell high-value goods, such as electronics or luxury items, but never actually fulfil any orders.

These virtual merchants process numerous transactions daily, with the illicit funds being funnelled through these fake businesses. The transactions are crafted to appear as legitimate sales, with funds being moved from one account to another in a complex pattern. By using sophisticated AI algorithms, the criminals can adjust their tactics in real-time, making it difficult for financial institutions to detect anomalies.

Furthermore, deepfake technology could be used to create convincing fake reviews and testimonials, adding an extra layer of legitimacy to these virtual merchants. This makes it challenging for compliance systems to identify the fraudulent nature of these businesses, thereby enabling the criminals to launder significant sums of money without ever delivering the products.

Challenges in detecting transaction laundering

Detecting transaction laundering presents several challenges:

• Complexity of Transactions: The complexity of transactions involving shell companies, fake invoices, and synthetic identities makes it difficult for financial institutions to identify and trace illicit activities.
• Evasion Techniques: Criminals constantly evolve their techniques to evade detection. The use of advanced technologies, such as AI and deepfakes, adds a layer of sophistication that can outpace traditional detection methods.
• Regulatory Oversight: Ensuring compliance with anti-money laundering regulations requires constant vigilance and adaptation. Financial institutions must stay updated on emerging techniques and technologies to effectively combat transaction laundering.

Addressing the threat

To counteract transaction laundering, financial institutions and regulators must:

• Enhance Due Diligence: Strengthen due diligence procedures to detect and prevent transaction laundering. This includes thorough background checks, monitoring for suspicious activities, and leveraging advanced technologies for fraud detection.
• Utilise Data Analytics: Employ data analytics and machine learning to identify patterns and anomalies in financial transactions. This can help in detecting unusual activities and potential laundering schemes.
• Promote Collaboration: Foster collaboration between financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement agencies. Sharing information and best practices can improve the effectiveness of anti-money laundering efforts.

Protecting against transaction laundering

Transaction laundering is a sophisticated and evolving method used by criminals to disguise illicit funds. Understanding the traditional and emerging techniques, as well as the challenges in detection, is crucial for financial institutions and regulators to effectively combat this threat. By enhancing due diligence, leveraging data analytics, and promoting collaboration, we can better address the risks associated with transaction laundering and protect the integrity of financial systems.

‍